| Title |
How do instructional designers evaluate? A qualitative study of evaluation in practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-011-9211-8 |
| Authors |
David D. Williams, Joseph B. South, Stephen C. Yanchar, Brent G. Wilson, Stephanie Allen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 15% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 81 | 54% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 5% |
| Design | 8 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,357,141
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#129
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,376
of 123,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them