↓ Skip to main content

Who Cares? Revisiting Empathy in Asperger Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
289 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
456 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Who Cares? Revisiting Empathy in Asperger Syndrome
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0197-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberley Rogers, Isabel Dziobek, Jason Hassenstab, Oliver T. Wolf, Antonio Convit

Abstract

A deficit in empathy has consistently been cited as a central characteristic of Asperger syndrome (AS), but previous research on adults has predominantly focused on cognitive empathy, effectively ignoring the role of affective empathy. We administered the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), a multi-dimensional measure of empathy, and the Strange Stories test to 21 adults with AS and 21 matched controls. Our data show that while the AS group scored lower on the measures of cognitive empathy and theory of mind, they were no different from controls on one affective empathy scale of the IRI (empathic concern), and scored higher than controls on the other (personal distress). Therefore, we propose that the issue of empathy in AS should be revisited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 8 2%
Australia 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 421 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 19%
Student > Master 64 14%
Researcher 56 12%
Student > Bachelor 56 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 10%
Other 67 15%
Unknown 80 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 205 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 9%
Neuroscience 24 5%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Other 54 12%
Unknown 97 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,129,451
of 25,545,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#405
of 5,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,873
of 94,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,545,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.