↓ Skip to main content

人間ドックの刷新を目指しての提言

Overview of attention for article published in Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock, February 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
人間ドックの刷新を目指しての提言
Published in
Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock, February 1989
DOI 10.11320/ningendock1986.3.2_5
Authors

日野原 重明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,757,283
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock
#3
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,819
of 54,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 38 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them