↓ Skip to main content

Demographic, Psychological, and Social Characteristics of Self-Identified Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adults in a US Probability Sample

Overview of attention for article published in Sexuality Research and Social Policy, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 537)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Demographic, Psychological, and Social Characteristics of Self-Identified Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adults in a US Probability Sample
Published in
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s13178-010-0017-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory M. Herek, Aaron T. Norton, Thomas J. Allen, Charles L. Sims

Abstract

Using data from a US national probability sample of self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults (N = 662), this article reports population parameter estimates for a variety of demographic, psychological, and social variables. Special emphasis is given to information with relevance to public policy and law. Compared with the US adult population, respondents were younger, more highly educated, and less likely to be non-Hispanic White, but differences were observed between gender and sexual orientation groups on all of these variables. Overall, respondents tended to be politically liberal, not highly religious, and supportive of marriage equality for same-sex couples. Women were more likely than men to be in a committed relationship. Virtually all coupled gay men and lesbians had a same-sex partner, whereas the vast majority of coupled bisexuals were in a heterosexual relationship. Compared with bisexuals, gay men and lesbians reported stronger commitment to a sexual-minority identity, greater community identification and involvement, and more extensive disclosure of their sexual orientation to others. Most respondents reported experiencing little or no choice about their sexual orientation. The importance of distinguishing among lesbians, gay men, bisexual women, and bisexual men in behavioral and social research is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 5%
Georgia 1 <1%
Unknown 165 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 24%
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 55 31%
Psychology 50 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 23 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#733,837
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#35
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,102
of 96,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.