| Title |
Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-013-0451-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jakob B. Bjorner, Matthias Rose, Barbara Gandek, Arthur A. Stone, Doerte U. Junghaenel, John E. Ware |
| Abstract |
To test the impact of method of administration (MOA) on the measurement characteristics of items developed in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 29% |
| Psychology | 27 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2015.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,996
of 2,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,293
of 197,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#22
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.