↓ Skip to main content

Additive value for ultrasonographic signal in a screening algorithm for patients presenting with acute mono-/oligoarthritis in whom gout is suspected

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Additive value for ultrasonographic signal in a screening algorithm for patients presenting with acute mono-/oligoarthritis in whom gout is suspected
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10067-014-2505-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. B. G. Lamers-Karnebeek, P. L. C. M. Van Riel, T. L. Jansen

Abstract

Crystal arthritides such as gout can be detected by ultrasonography (US). This study reveals the performance of joint US (double contour sign (DCS), tophus (T), hyperechoic spots cq. "snow storm" (SS)) for diagnosing gout and calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease (CPPD) in patients with acute mono- or oligoarthritis (MOA). The gold standard is the presence of monosodium urate (MSU)/CPPD crystals. Fifty-four Dutch patients had an acute MOA. US was performed on the following six joints maximum: the arthritic joint, the contra lateral side, metatarsophalangeal (MTP)-1, and knees bilaterally in case of arthritis in one of these joints. In case of wrist/PIP/MCP-arthritis, the knees and MTP-1 were scanned. These were examined for DCS, T, SS, and intercartilage rim (CPPD). Synovial fluid was aspirated from the affected joint for MSU proof. Twenty-six of the 54 (48 %) patients with MOA had MSU-proven gout. Sensitivity of DCS and any US abnormality (DCS, T, SS) was 77 and 96 %, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) for DCS and any ultrasonographic abnormality (USabn) was 3.08 and 2.99, respectively, and the LR- was 0.31 and 0.06, respectively. In MSU-proven gout patients where the affected joint is not MTP-1, MTP-1 still showed USabn in 42 % of the patients. None of the CPPD patients had an intercartilage rim. In dedicated hands, ultrasonography deserves a place early in a screening algorithm of MOA patients, particularly if specificity is high enough to make punctures abundant or when microscopy is not available. In 86 % of the MSU-proven gout patients, the DCS is not present in another joint other than the affected or MTP-1 joint.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,309
of 2,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,577
of 310,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#62
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.