↓ Skip to main content

Association between diarrheal duration and nutritional decline: Implications for an empirically validated definition of persistent diarrhea

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, September 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Association between diarrheal duration and nutritional decline: Implications for an empirically validated definition of persistent diarrhea
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, September 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02751718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nita Bhandari, Sunil Sazawal, John D. Clemens, Dharmendra K. Kashyap, Usha Dhingra, Maharaj K. Bhan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#286
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,304
of 21,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them