↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load In Cardiovascular Disease And Its Risk Factors: A Review of The Recent Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 789)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load In Cardiovascular Disease And Its Risk Factors: A Review of The Recent Literature
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11883-013-0381-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arash Mirrahimi, Laura Chiavaroli, Korbua Srichaikul, Livia S. A. Augustin, John L. Sievenpiper, Cyril W. C. Kendall, David J. A. Jenkins

Abstract

A number of meta-analyses of cohort studies have assessed the impact of glycemic load (GL) and glycemic index (GI) on cardiovascular outcomes. The picture that emerges is that for women, a significant association appears to exist between the consumption of high GL/GI diets and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This association appears to be stronger in those with greater adiposity and possibly in those with diabetes, although these findings are not uniform. There is also an indication that raised CRP levels may be reduced, which has special implications for women whose CRP levels, as an emerging CVD risk factor, may be higher than men. For men, the situation is not as clear-cut. Although some studies show association, the meta-analyses have not demonstrated a significant direct association with CVD, despite current evidence that risk factors, including LDL-C, may be reduced on low-GI diets. Moreover, in a recent meta-analysis, increases in dietary GL have been associated with increased risk of diabetes, another CVD risk factor, in both men and women. Studies in men expressing relative risk of CVD in relation to GL and GI, with corresponding confidence intervals, are needed to provide the necessary power for future meta-analyses on this topic.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 20%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#925,295
of 23,709,010 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#45
of 789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,643
of 213,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,709,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.