↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Culture in Health Literacy and Chronic Disease Screening and Management

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 1,261)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
422 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Culture in Health Literacy and Chronic Disease Screening and Management
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10903-008-9135-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan J. Shaw, Cristina Huebner, Julie Armin, Katherine Orzech, James Vivian

Abstract

Cultural and language differences and socioeconomic status interact with and contribute to low health literacy, defined as the inability to understand or act on medical/therapeutic instructions. Health literacy is increasingly recognized as an important factor in patient compliance, cancer screening utilization, and chronic disease outcomes. Commendable efforts have been initiated by the American Medical Association and other organizations to address low health literacy among patients. Less work has been done, however, to place health literacy in the broader context of socioeconomic and cultural differences among patients and providers that hinder communication and compliance. This review examines cultural influences on health literacy, cancer screening and chronic disease outcomes. We argue that cultural beliefs around health and illness contribute to an individual's ability to understand and act on a health care provider's instructions. This paper proposes key aspects of the intersection between health literacy and culturally varying beliefs about health which merit further exploration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 411 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 11%
Researcher 44 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 8%
Other 76 18%
Unknown 78 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 27%
Social Sciences 88 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 13%
Psychology 20 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 3%
Other 57 14%
Unknown 80 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#893,416
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#36
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,770
of 83,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them