↓ Skip to main content

Current evidence on physical therapy in patients with adhesive capsulitis: what are we missing?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
Title
Current evidence on physical therapy in patients with adhesive capsulitis: what are we missing?
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10067-013-2464-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filip Struyf, Mira Meeus

Abstract

Adhesive capsulitis is, in most cases, a self-limiting condition of poorly understood etiology that results in shoulder pain and large mobility deficits. The socio-economic burden will increase as with continuous aging of our population. In addition, both prevalence and incidence figures of adhesive capsulitis are increasing. No literature overview solely focuses on the physiotherapeutic options in patients with adhesive capsulitis and their scientific evidence. Moreover, although some physiotherapeutic interventions show evidence regarding reducing pain or increasing mobility, there is little evidence to suggest that the disease prognosis is affected and this raises the need for new, innovative research in the area of adhesive capsulitis and its treatment. By presenting its current evidence, we hope to retrieve several gaps in the present management of adhesive capsulitis by physiotherapists and provide us with new insights for improving the physiotherapists' policy in treating adhesive capsulitis patients, e.g., continuously increasing nociceptive impulse activity, as in early stages of adhesive capsulitis, could lead to peripheral and subsequently long-lasting central sensitization, as well as to an increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system. But up to now the involvement of central sensitization in adhesive capsulitis has not been studied yet and remains speculative. Finally, when selecting a physical treatment method for adhesive capsulitis, it is extremely important to consider the patient's symptoms, stage of the condition, and recognition of different patterns of motion loss. Guidelines for clinical assessment will be presented in this scoping review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 273 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 21%
Student > Bachelor 55 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Other 18 6%
Other 55 20%
Unknown 51 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 25%
Sports and Recreations 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 57 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,972,885
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,055
of 3,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,300
of 308,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.