↓ Skip to main content

Timing matters: Temporal dynamics of stress effects on memory retrieval

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Timing matters: Temporal dynamics of stress effects on memory retrieval
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13415-014-0256-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars Schwabe, Oliver T. Wolf

Abstract

Stress may impair memory retrieval. This retrieval impairment has been attributed to the action of the stress hormone cortisol, which is released with a delay of several minutes after a stressful encounter. Hence, most studies tested memory retrieval 20-30 min after stress, when the stress-induced cortisol increase peaks. In the present experiment, we investigated whether retrieval impairments can also be found at later intervals after stress. To this end, participants learned a list of words on day 1. Twenty-four hours later, they were first exposed to a stressor or a nonstressful control manipulation and completed a recognition test for the words either immediately thereafter, 25 min later, or 90 min later. Our findings showed that stress did not impair memory retrieval when memory was tested immediately after the stressor, before cortisol levels were elevated. However, retrieval performance was impaired 25 min after stress, when cortisol levels peaked, as well as 90 min after the stressor, when cortisol levels had already returned to baseline. The retrieval impairment 90 min after stress appeared to be even stronger than the one after 25 min. These findings suggest that the detrimental effects of stress on retrieval performance may last longer than is usually assumed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 9 7%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 38%
Neuroscience 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,804,975
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#130
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,381
of 315,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.