↓ Skip to main content

Rates of Growth and Loss of Bone Mineral in the Spine and Femoral Neck in White Females

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Rates of Growth and Loss of Bone Mineral in the Spine and Femoral Neck in White Females
Published in
Osteoporosis International, March 1999
DOI 10.1007/s001980050137
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. L. Hui, L. Zhou, R. Evans, C. W. Slemenda, M. Peacock, C. M. Weaver, C. McClintock, C. C. Johnston Jr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 33%
Student > Master 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,383
of 3,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,137
of 35,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.