↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Behavioral Interventions for Repetitive Behaviors in Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Evidence-Based Behavioral Interventions for Repetitive Behaviors in Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1284-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A. Boyd, Stephen G. McDonough, James W. Bodfish

Abstract

Restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs) are a core symptom of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). There has been an increased research emphasis on repetitive behaviors; however, this research primarily has focused on phenomenology and mechanisms. Thus, the knowledge base on interventions is lagging behind other areas of research. The literature suggests there are evidence-based practices to treat "lower order" RRBs in ASD (e.g., stereotypies); yet, there is a lack of a focused program of intervention research for "higher order" behaviors (e.g., insistence on sameness). This paper will (a) discuss barriers to intervention development for RRBs; (b) review evidence-based interventions to treat RRBs in ASD, with a focus on higher order behaviors; and (c) conclude with recommendations for practice and research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 376 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 49 13%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 6%
Other 79 21%
Unknown 69 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 137 36%
Social Sciences 54 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 8%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 90 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,568,447
of 24,512,028 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#639
of 5,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,477
of 115,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#8
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,512,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.