↓ Skip to main content

From theory to practice: how to apply van Deth’s conceptual map in empirical political participation research

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Politica, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
From theory to practice: how to apply van Deth’s conceptual map in empirical political participation research
Published in
Acta Politica, July 2017
DOI 10.1057/s41269-017-0056-y
Authors

Jakob Ohme, Claes H. de Vreese, Erik Albæk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 33 54%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,463,322
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Acta Politica
#51
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,515
of 328,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Politica
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them