↓ Skip to main content

Rat C6 glioma as experimental model system for the study of glioblastoma growth and invasion

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
Rat C6 glioma as experimental model system for the study of glioblastoma growth and invasion
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, November 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00441-002-0651-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bert Grobben, Peter De Deyn, Herman Slegers

Abstract

Infiltration of the central nervous system by neoplastic cells in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) leads to neurological dysfunction and eventually to death. The elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the aggressive nature of GBM aims at improving radio-, chemo- and gene therapy. This review is focused on the use of rat C6 glioma as an experimental model system for GBM and provides an overview of the experimental data published in the literature using this cell line in elucidating the mechanism of tumor growth, angiogenesis and invasion, and in the design and evaluation of anticancer therapies. Understanding the stages of malignant brain tumor progression requires a series of experimental approaches with a varying degree of complexity. Implantation of malignant cells into animal brain tissue closely resembles in vivo tumor growth and has the advantage over simplified models that inflammatory and vascular mechanisms are activated. However, the complexity of these models makes it difficult to identify the individual processes involved in sustained tumor growth, angiogenesis and invasion. In cell culture models, the effect of growth factors, extracellular matrix components, proteases and adhesion molecules can be investigated. The secretion of tumor-derived factors into the medium can also be analyzed when simplified models are used. This review is a compilation of experimental data focused on the characterization of tumor-related processes and on the evaluation of new therapies for the treatment of malignant glial neoplasms using rat C6 glioma as a model system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 219 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 21%
Student > Master 45 19%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 9%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 11%
Chemistry 21 9%
Neuroscience 19 8%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 45 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#545
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,531
of 56,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.