↓ Skip to main content

Lynch Syndrome Patients’ Views of and Preferences for Return of Results Following Whole Exome Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Lynch Syndrome Patients’ Views of and Preferences for Return of Results Following Whole Exome Sequencing
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10897-014-9687-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly Hitch, Galen Joseph, Jenna Guiltinan, Jessica Kianmahd, Janey Youngblom, Amie Blanco

Abstract

Whole exome sequencing (WES) uses next generation sequencing technology to provide information on nearly all functional, protein-coding regions in an individual's genome. Due to the vast amount of information and incidental findings that can be generated from this technology, patient preferences must be investigated to help clinicians consent and return results to patients. Patients (n = 19) who were previously clinically diagnosed with Lynch syndrome, but received uninformative negative Lynch syndrome genetic results through traditional molecular testing methods participated in semi-structured interviews after WES testing but before return of results to explore their views of WES and preferences for return of results. Analyses of interview results found that nearly all participants believed that the benefits of receiving all possible results generated from WES outweighed the undesirable effects. The majority of participants conveyed that relative to coping with a cancer diagnosis, information generated from WES would be manageable. Importantly, participants' experience with Lynch syndrome influenced their notions of genetic determinism, tolerance for uncertain results, and family communication plans. Participants would prefer to receive WES results in person from a genetic counselor or medical geneticist so that an expert could help explain the meaning and implications of the potentially large quantity and range of complicated results. These results underscore the need to study various populations with regard to the clinical use of WES in order to effectively and empathetically communicate the possible implications of this new technology and return results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 22%
Student > Master 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 16%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,989,215
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#442
of 1,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,427
of 306,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.