↓ Skip to main content

The Neurodevelopmental Hypothesis of Schizophrenia Convergent Clues from Epidemiology and Neuropathology

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatric clinics of North America, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Neurodevelopmental Hypothesis of Schizophrenia Convergent Clues from Epidemiology and Neuropathology
Published in
Psychiatric clinics of North America, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.psc.2012.06.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Piper, Monica Beneyto, Thomas H.J. Burne, Darryl W. Eyles, David A. Lewis, John J. McGrath

Abstract

The neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia suggests that the disruption of early brain development increases the risk of later developing schizophrenia. This hypothesis focuses attention on critical periods of early brain development. From an epidemiologic perspective, various prenatal and perinatal risk factors have been linked to schizophrenia, including exposures related to infection, nutrition, and obstetric complications. From a genetic perspective, candidate genes have also been linked to altered brain development. In recent decades evidence from neuropathology has provided support for the neurodevelopmental hypothesis. Animal models involving early life exposures have been linked to changes in these same brain systems, providing convergent evidence for this long-standing hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 148 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 15%
Psychology 22 14%
Neuroscience 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,536,099
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric clinics of North America
#337
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,921
of 179,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric clinics of North America
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.