Title |
Imaging of hibernomas: A retrospective study on twelve cases
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Sarcoma Research, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-3329-1-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zafiria G Papathanassiou, Marco Alberghini, Sophie Taieb, Costantino Errani, Piero Picci, Daniel Vanel |
Abstract |
To analyze the imaging features of hibernomas on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MRI). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 45% |
Researcher | 3 | 27% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 73% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2011.
All research outputs
#4,641,056
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#16
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,087
of 119,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.