↓ Skip to main content

A study of immunoprophylaxis failure and risk factors of hepatitis B virus mother-to-infant transmission

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
A study of immunoprophylaxis failure and risk factors of hepatitis B virus mother-to-infant transmission
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00431-014-2305-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Zhang, Xien Gui, Bo Wang, Huiping Ji, Reziyan Yisilafu, Fengliang Li, Yun Zhou, Ling Zhang, Hui Zhang, Xiaohong Liu

Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is of high prevalence in China. Mother-to-infant transmission is the major route for HBV transmission and subsequent chronicity. This study aimed to investigate current HBsAg-positive rate among pregnant women and immunoprophylaxis outcome in China. Multicenter prospective study was conducted in 10 centers. From 2008 to 2012, 67,720 pregnant women were screened and 1,150 HBsAg-carrier mothers and their infants aged 8-12 months were studied in four out of all centers, among whom HBV markers (HBsAg, HBsAb, HBeAg, HBeAb, and HBcAb) and HBV DNA (in three centers) were measured. The results showed that HBsAg-positive rate of pregnant women was 6.7 % (4,533/67,720) and infants' immunoprophylaxis failure rate was 3.4 % (39/1,150). Immunoprophylaxis failure infants were all born to mothers of HBeAg-positive and HBV DNA ≥6 log10 copies/ml. Among infants of HBeAg-positive mothers, multivariable analyses showed the following: mother's age <28 years vs ≥28 years, RR = 0.157, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [0.067, 0.369], p = 0.000; Neonates receiving vaccine vs vaccine plus hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), RR = 0.371, 95 % CI [0.167, 0.825], p = 0.015. Pregnant women receiving HBIG in the third trimester, vaginal delivery and breastfeeding had no significant effects on HBV mother-to-infant transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 22 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 25 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#3,103
of 3,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,583
of 226,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#28
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.