| Title |
Associations Between Antidepressant Adherence and Shared Decision-Making, Patient–Provider Trust, and Communication Among Adults with Diabetes: Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-2845-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy M. Bauer, Melissa M. Parker, Dean Schillinger, Wayne Katon, Nancy Adler, Alyce S. Adams, Howard H. Moffet, Andrew J. Karter |
| Abstract |
Depression and adherence to antidepressant treatment are important clinical concerns in diabetes care. While patient-provider communication patterns have been associated with adherence for cardiometabolic medications, it is unknown whether interpersonal aspects of care impact antidepressant medication adherence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 239 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 26% |
| Psychology | 34 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,111,090
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#907
of 8,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,680
of 233,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#7
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.