You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of Worldwide Version of System for Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information: WSPEEDI 2nd Version
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3327/taesj.j07.045 |
| Authors |
Hiroaki TERADA, Haruyasu NAGAI, Akiko FURUNO, Toyokazu KAKEFUDA, Takaya HARAYAMA, Masamichi CHINO |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#8
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,440
of 168,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them