| Title |
Clinical experience with synthetic serum substitute as a protein supplement in IVF culture media: A retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, January 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02068865 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina N. Desai, Leon A. Sheean, Donalee Martin, Victoria Gindlesperger, Cynthia M. Austin, Hanna Lisbonna, Barry Peskin, James M. Goldfarb |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,022,830
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#474
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,661
of 82,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.