↓ Skip to main content

Reflecting Resiliency: Openness About Sexual Orientation and/or Gender Identity and Its Relationship to Well‐Being and Educational Outcomes for LGBT Students

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Community Psychology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
631 Mendeley
Title
Reflecting Resiliency: Openness About Sexual Orientation and/or Gender Identity and Its Relationship to Well‐Being and Educational Outcomes for LGBT Students
Published in
American Journal of Community Psychology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10464-014-9642-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph G. Kosciw, Neal A. Palmer, Ryan M. Kull

Abstract

For lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) youth, coming out (i.e., disclosure of LGBT identity to others) can be a key developmental milestone, one that is associated with better psychological well-being. However, this greater visibility may come with increased risk of peer victimization. Being out, therefore, may reflect resilience and may unfold differently depending on ecological context as some spaces may be more or less supportive of LGBT youth than others. This article explores a model of risk and resilience for outness among LGBT youth, including whether it varies by community context. We tested our hypothesized model with a national dataset of 7,816 LGBT secondary school students using multi-group structural equation modeling. Consistent with our hypotheses, outness was related to higher victimization but also to higher self-esteem and lower depression. Greater victimization was related to negative academic outcomes directly and indirectly via diminished well-being. The increases in victimization associated with outness were larger for rural youth, and benefits to well-being partly compensated for their lower well-being overall. This article suggests that being out reflects resilience in the face of higher risk of victimization, in addition to promoting well-being in other ways. Nonetheless, contextual factors influence how this model operates among LGBT youth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 631 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 619 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 93 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 14%
Student > Master 85 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 71 11%
Researcher 40 6%
Other 102 16%
Unknown 151 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 203 32%
Social Sciences 125 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 4%
Arts and Humanities 19 3%
Other 42 7%
Unknown 180 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,108,660
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Community Psychology
#52
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,638
of 238,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Community Psychology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.