↓ Skip to main content

Caloric beverage drinking patterns are differentially associated with diet quality and adiposity among Spanish girls and boys

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Caloric beverage drinking patterns are differentially associated with diet quality and adiposity among Spanish girls and boys
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00431-014-2302-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmut Schröder, Michelle A. Mendez, Lourdes Ribas, Anna N. Funtikova, Santiago F. Gomez, Montserrat Fíto, Javier Aranceta, Lluis Serra-Majem

Abstract

The present study assesses the impact of beverage consumption pattern on diet quality and anthropometric proxy measures for abdominal adiposity in Spanish adolescents. Data were obtained from a representative national sample of 1,149 Spanish adolescents aged 10-18 years. Height, weight, and waist circumferences were measured. Dietary assessment was performed with a 24-h recall. Beverage patterns were identified by cluster analysis. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet was measured by the KIDMED index. Three beverage clusters were identified for boys--"whole milk" (62.5 %), "low-fat milk" (17.5 %) and "soft drinks" (20.1 %)-and for girls--"whole milk" (57.8 %), "low-fat milk" (20.8 %) and juice (21.4 %), accounting for 8.3, 9.6, 13.9, 8.6, 11.5 and 12.9 % of total energy intake, respectively. Each unit of increase in the KIDMED index was associated with a 14.0 % higher (p = 0.004) and 11.0 % lower (p = 0.048) probability of membership in the "low-fat milk" and "soft drinks" cluster in girls and boys, respectively, compared with the "whole milk" cluster. Boys in the "soft drinks" cluster had a higher risk of 1-unit increase in BMI z score (29.0 %, p = 0.040), 1-cm increase in waist circumference regressed on height and age (3.0 %, p = 0.027) and 0.1-unit increase in waist/height ratio (21.4 %, p = 0.031) compared with the "whole milk" cluster.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 20%
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,004,063
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,467
of 4,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,645
of 240,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.