↓ Skip to main content

Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
Title
Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis resource management: a systematic review
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12630-014-0143-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvain Boet, M. Dylan Bould, Lillia Fung, Haytham Qosa, Laure Perrier, Walter Tavares, Scott Reeves, Andrea C. Tricco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 283 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 15%
Other 30 10%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Professor 19 7%
Other 77 27%
Unknown 68 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 11%
Psychology 14 5%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 83 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,638,784
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#408
of 2,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,633
of 241,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.