↓ Skip to main content

The 2010 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: The Trauma Signature of an Ecological Disaster

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
The 2010 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: The Trauma Signature of an Ecological Disaster
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11414-014-9398-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M. Shultz, Lauren Walsh, Dana Rose Garfin, Fiona E. Wilson, Yuval Neria

Abstract

The 2010 Deepwater Horizon "British Petroleum (BP)" oil spill was a mega-disaster characterized as the petroleum industry's largest-volume marine oil spill in history. Following a "wellhead blowout" that destroyed the drilling platform, 4.9 million barrels of petroleum flowed into the Gulf of Mexico over 87 days and the spill expanded to cover 68,000 square miles of sea surface. However, despite the expansive scope of the event, systematic surveys of affected coastal populations found only modest effects on mental health and substance abuse. An established trauma signature (TSIG) methodology was used to examine the psychological consequences in relation to exposure to the unique constellation of hazards associated with the spill. A hazard profile, a matrix of psychological stressors, and a "trauma signature" summary for the affected Gulf Coast population-in terms of exposure to hazard, loss, and change-were created specifically for this human-generated ecological disaster. Psychological risk characteristics of this event included: human causation featuring corporate culpability, large spill volume, protracted duration, coastal contamination from petroleum products, severe ecological damage, disruption of Gulf Coast industries and tourism, and extensive media coverage. The multiple impact effect was notable due to prior exposure of the region to Hurricane Katrina. These stressors were counterbalanced by the relative absence of other prominent risks for distress and psychopathology. Coastal residents did not experience significant onshore spill-related mortality or severe injury, shortages of survival needs, disruption of vital services (health care, schools, utilities, communications, and transportation), loss of homes, population displacement, destruction of the built environment, or loss of social supports. Initial acute economic losses were partially offset by large-sum BP payments for cleanup and recovery of the coastal economy. Not only did Gulf Coast populations display remarkable resilience in the face of daunting challenges, the behavioral health impact of the Deepwater Horizon spill appears to have been blunted by the absence of major evidence-based risks for psychological distress and disorder, the exemplary response, and the infusion of economic resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 233 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 63 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 27 11%
Environmental Science 21 9%
Psychology 20 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Other 60 25%
Unknown 78 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2014.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#358
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,058
of 227,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.