↓ Skip to main content

Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: SBM supports curbing summertime weight gain among America's youth

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Behavioral Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: SBM supports curbing summertime weight gain among America's youth
Published in
Translational Behavioral Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13142-017-0512-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Bohnert, Nicole Zarrett, Michael W. Beets, Georgia Hall, Joanna Buscemi, Amy Heard, Russell Pate

Abstract

The Society of Behavioral Medicine recommends adoption of policies at the district, state, and federal levels that minimize weight gain among youth over the summertime, particularly among low-income, minority school-age youth who appear to be at greater risk. Policies that facilitate (1) partnerships between school districts and community organizations to provide affordable summertime programming, (2) strategic efforts by schools and communities to encourage families to enroll and attend summertime programming via the creation of community-wide summertime offerings offices, (3) adoption of joint-use/shared use agreements in communities to promote use of indoor and outdoor school facilities to provide affordable programming during the summer months, and (4) implementation of strategies that help summer programs achieve the Healthy Eating and Physical Activity (HEPA) standards which have been endorsed by the Healthy Out-of-School Time (HOST) coalition. Research is needed to elucidate key mechanisms by which involvement in structured programming may reduce weight gain over the summer months.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,872,119
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#637
of 1,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,489
of 315,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.