↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Testing Protocol Reduces Costs and Increases Rate of Genetic Diagnosis in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Genetic Testing Protocol Reduces Costs and Increases Rate of Genetic Diagnosis in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00246-017-1685-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabrielle C. Geddes, Donald Basel, Peter Frommelt, Aaron Kinney, Michael Earing

Abstract

Genetic testing is routinely performed on infants with critical congenital heart disease (CHD). This project reviewed the effect of implementing a genetic testing protocol in this population. Charts of infants with critical CHD were reviewed for genetic testing and results across two time periods: the time before implementation of a genetic testing protocol (pre-protocol) and the time after implementation (post-protocol). The use of karyotype, 22q11.2 Deletion testing, and chromosomal microarray were compared across these two time periods. Records of 891 infants were reviewed. 562 (63%) had at least one of the target genetic tests completed. During the pre-protocol time period, 66% of patients who had genetic testing underwent multiple tests versus 24% during the post-protocol time period (p < 0.01). The rate of patients who underwent genetic testing increased from 60% in the pre-protocol time period to 77% in the post-protocol time period (p < 0.01). The rate of diagnosis of genetic conditions during the pre-protocol period was 26% versus 36% during the post-protocol period (p = 0.01). There was a reduction in cost to patients by $5105.59 per diagnosis during the post-protocol period. Patients with critical CHD in the post-protocol period were less likely to undergo multiple genetic tests and more likely to have a diagnosis of genetic disease. In addition there was a significant reduction in cost per diagnosis during the post-protocol time period. Genetic testing protocols for infants with critical CHD promoted more efficient use of genetic testing and increased the rate of diagnosis of genetic conditions in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Other 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 35%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Linguistics 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,472,268
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#660
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,138
of 315,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.