↓ Skip to main content

Effect of nutritional condition on larval food requisition behavior in a subterranean termite Reticulitermes speratus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Effect of nutritional condition on larval food requisition behavior in a subterranean termite Reticulitermes speratus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae)
Published in
Journal of Ethology, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10164-012-0343-z
Authors

Kazutaka Kawatsu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 6%
Brazil 2 6%
Unknown 31 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 74%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#181
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,607
of 170,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.