You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Neuroblastoma Mass Screening in Gunma Prefecture.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Kitakanto Medical Journal, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.2974/kmj.54.201 |
| Authors |
Toshiji Shitara, Norio Suzuki, Minoru Kuroiwa, Rika Itoh, Masae Abe, Yoshiaki Tsuchida, Shigemi Matsushima, Shigeo Manabe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,936,547
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from The Kitakanto Medical Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,891
of 138,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Kitakanto Medical Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them