↓ Skip to main content

Interspecific variations in the faecal microbiota of Procellariiform seabirds

Overview of attention for article published in FEMS Microbiology Ecology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interspecific variations in the faecal microbiota of Procellariiform seabirds
Published in
FEMS Microbiology Ecology, April 2014
DOI 10.1111/1574-6941.12332
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meagan L. Dewar, John P.Y. Arnould, Lutz Krause, Peter Dann, Stuart C. Smith

Abstract

Despite the enormous amount of data available on the importance of gut microbiota in vertebrates (especially mammals), there is no information available on the microbiota of seabirds. Procellariiformes are long-lived seabirds that consume a diet high in lipids and are characterised by their ability to produce and store large amount of stomach oils through the partial digestion of prey (with the exception of the Pelecanoididae). Examining the faecal microbiota of three Procellariiform species (short-tailed shearwater, common diving petrel and fairy prion) provided a unique opportunity to not only characterise the gastrointestinal (GI) microbial composition of seabirds but to also examine the influence of stomach oils on the microbial community. The results indicated that Procellariiform seabirds host a highly diverse community of faecal microorganisms, dominated by three phyla (Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes) and that each species has its own species-specific GI microbiota. In addition, significant differences were observed in the microbial communities of oil-producing and non-oil-producing seabirds. This study is the first whole-community examination and classification of the faecal microbiota of Procellariiform seabirds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 30%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 42%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from FEMS Microbiology Ecology
#407
of 2,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,066
of 242,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEMS Microbiology Ecology
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.