↓ Skip to main content

Resolving genetic diversity in Australasian Culex mosquitoes: Incongruence between the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I and nuclear acetylcholine esterase 2

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resolving genetic diversity in Australasian Culex mosquitoes: Incongruence between the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I and nuclear acetylcholine esterase 2
Published in
Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, November 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.11.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphane Hemmerter, Jan Šlapeta, Nigel W. Beebe

Abstract

Insects that vector pathogens are under constant surveillance in Australasia although the repertoire of genetic markers to distinguish what are often cryptic mosquito species remains limited. We present a comparative assessment of the second exon-intron region of the acetylcholine esterase 2 gene (ace-2) and the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) using two closely related Australasia mosquitoes Culex annulirostris and Culex palpalis. The COI revealed eight divergent lineages of which four were confirmed with the ace-2. We dissect out the nuclear chromosomal haplotypes of the ace-2 as well as the exon-intron regions by assessing the protein's tertiary structure to reveal a hypervariable 5'-exon that forms part of an external protein loop and displays a higher polymorphic rate than the intron. We retrace the evolutionary history of these mosquitoes by phylogenetic inference and by testing different evolutionary hypotheses. We conclude that DNA barcoding using COI may overestimate the diversity of Culex mosquitoes in Australasia and should be applied cautiously with support from the nuclear DNA such as the ace-2. Together the COI and ace-2 provide robust evidence for distinct cryptic Culex lineages--one of which correlates exactly with the southern limit of Japanese encephalitis virus activity in Australasia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 73 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 61%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution
#1,555
of 4,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,220
of 178,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.