↓ Skip to main content

Reflection of illness and strategies for handling advanced lung cancer – a qualitative analysis in patients and their relatives

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Reflection of illness and strategies for handling advanced lung cancer – a qualitative analysis in patients and their relatives
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2110-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anika Sparla, Sebastian Flach-Vorgang, Matthias Villalobos, Katja Krug, Martina Kamradt, Kadiatou Coulibaly, Joachim Szecsenyi, Michael Thomas, Sinikka Gusset-Bährer, Dominik Ose

Abstract

Lung cancer patients are often diagnosed in an advanced stage of disease. In a situation of palliative treatment, both patients and their relatives experience existential burden. Evidence suggests that multi-professional teams should deal with them as dyads. However, little is known about differences in their individual situation. The purpose of this study is to explore and compare reflections that arise out of the context of diagnosis and to compare how patients and their relatives try to handle advanced lung cancer. Data was collected by qualitative interviews. A total of 18 participants, 9 patients diagnosed with advanced lung cancer (ICD- 10 C-34, stage IV) starting or receiving palliative treatment and 9 relatives were interviewed. Data was interpreted using qualitative content analysis. Reflection aspects were "thoughts about the cause", "meaning of belief" and "experience of inequity". Patients often experienced the diagnosis as inequity and were more receptive for believing in treatment success. The main strategies found were "repression", "positive attitude", "strong focus on the present" and "adjustment of life terms". Patient and relative dyads used the same strategies, but with different emphasis. That life time is limited was more frequently realized by relatives than by patients. While strategies used by relatives are similar to those of patients', they are less reflective and more pragmatic in terms of handling daily life and organizing care. The interviewed patients were mostly not able to takeover these tasks. To strong was their belief in treatment success, their repression of the future and the focus on the present. This implicates, that in terms of end-of-life care, relatives are important to reach patients who are often not receptive to this topic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 24%
Psychology 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#20,438,227
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#7,169
of 7,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,707
of 310,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#144
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.