↓ Skip to main content

Value-based modulation of memory encoding involves strategic engagement of fronto-temporal semantic processing regions

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Value-based modulation of memory encoding involves strategic engagement of fronto-temporal semantic processing regions
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13415-014-0275-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael S. Cohen, Jesse Rissman, Nanthia A. Suthana, Alan D. Castel, Barbara J. Knowlton

Abstract

A number of prior fMRI studies have focused on the ways in which the midbrain dopaminergic reward system coactivates with hippocampus to potentiate memory for valuable items. However, another means by which people could selectively remember more valuable to-be-remembered items is to be selective in their use of effective but effortful encoding strategies. To broadly examine the neural mechanisms of value on subsequent memory, we used fMRI to assess how differences in brain activity at encoding as a function of value relate to subsequent free recall for words. Each word was preceded by an arbitrarily assigned point value, and participants went through multiple study-test cycles with feedback on their point total at the end of each list, allowing for sculpting of cognitive strategies. We examined the correlation between value-related modulation of brain activity and participants' selectivity index, which measures how close participants were to their optimal point total, given the number of items recalled. Greater selectivity scores were associated with greater differences in the activation of semantic processing regions, including left inferior frontal gyrus and left posterior lateral temporal cortex, during the encoding of high-value words relative to low-value words. Although we also observed value-related modulation within midbrain and ventral striatal reward regions, our fronto-temporal findings suggest that strategic engagement of deep semantic processing may be an important mechanism for selectively encoding valuable items.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 24%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 43%
Neuroscience 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,115,997
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#547
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,588
of 228,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.