| Title |
Hip Resurfacing versus Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Comparing Standardized Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3556-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah A. Marshall, Karen Pykerman, Jason Werle, Diane Lorenzetti, Tracy Wasylak, Tom Noseworthy, Donald A. Dick, Greg O’Connor, Aish Sundaram, Sanne Heintzbergen, Cy Frank |
| Abstract |
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing was developed for younger, active patients as an alternative to THA, but it remains controversial. Study heterogeneity, inconsistent outcome definitions, and unstandardized outcome measures challenge our ability to compare arthroplasty outcomes studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 55% |
| Canada | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 42 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 46% |
| Engineering | 12 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,760,513
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,025
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,648
of 239,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#12
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.