↓ Skip to main content

Update on psoriasis immunopathogenesis and targeted immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Immunopathology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 672)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
Title
Update on psoriasis immunopathogenesis and targeted immunotherapy
Published in
Seminars in Immunopathology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00281-015-0539-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satveer K. Mahil, Francesca Capon, Jonathan N. Barker

Abstract

Over recent years, significant progress has been made in characterisation of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms in psoriasis, a common cutaneous disease that is associated with major systemic co-morbidity and reduced life expectancy. Basic science discoveries have informed the design of novel therapeutic approaches, many of which are now under evaluation in late-stage clinical trials. Here we describe the complex interplay between immune cell types and cytokine networks that acts within self-perpetuating feedback loops to drive cutaneous inflammation in psoriasis. Genetic studies have been pivotal in the construction of the disease model and more recently have uncovered a distinct aetiology for rare, pustular variants of psoriasis. The translation of mechanistic insights into potential advancements in clinical care will also be described, including several treatments that target the interleukin-23 (IL-23)/T17 immune axis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 274 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Other 24 9%
Researcher 20 7%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 92 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 5%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 93 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#635,027
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Immunopathology
#15
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,579
of 267,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Immunopathology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.