↓ Skip to main content

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00415-002-0800-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.S. Fassas, J. R. Passweg, A. Anagnostopoulos, A. Kazis, T. Kozak, E. Havrdova, E. Carreras, F. Graus, A. Kashyap, H. Openshaw, M. Schipperus, E. Deconinck, G. Mancardi, A. Marmont, J. Hansz, M. Rabusin, F. J. Zuazu Nagore, J. Besalduch, T. Dentamaro, L. Fouillard, B. Hertenstein, G. La Nasa, M. Musso, F. Papineschi, J. M. Rowe, R. Saccardi, A. Steck, L. Kappos, A. Gratwohl, A. Tyndall, for the Autoimmune Disease Working Party of the EBMT (European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation)

Abstract

Phase I/II studies of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for multiple sclerosis ( MS) were initiated, based on results of experimental transplantation in animal models of multiple sclerosis and clinical observations in patients treated concomitantly for malignant disease. Eighty-five patients with progressive MS were treated with autologous HSCT in 20 centers and reported to the autoimmune disease working party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). 52 (61 %) were female, median age was 39 [20-58] years. The median interval from diagnosis to transplant was 7 [1-26] years. Patients suffered from severe disease with a median EDSS score of 6.5 [4.5-8.5]. Active disease prior to transplant was documented in 79 of 82 evaluable cases. The stem cell source was bone marrow in 6 and peripheral blood in 79, and stem cells were mobilized into peripheral blood using either cyclophosphamide combined with growth factors or growth factors alone. Three patients experienced transient neurological complications during the mobilization phase. The high dose regimen included combination chemotherapy, with or without anti-lymphocyte antibodies or, with or without, total body irradiation. The stem cell transplants were purged of lymphocytes in 52 patients. Median follow-up was 16 [3-59] months. There were 7 deaths, 5 due to toxicity and infectious complications, 2 with neurological deterioration. The risk of death of any cause at 3 years was 10 (+/-7)% (95 % confidence interval). Neurological deterioration during transplant was observed in 22 patients; this was transient in most but was associated with MS progression in 6 patients. Neurological improvement by > or = 1 point in the EDSS score was seen in 18 (21 %) patients. Confirmed progression-free survival was 74 (+/-12)% at 3 years being 66 (+/-23)% in patients with primary progressive MS but higher in patients with secondary progressive or relapsing-remitting MS, 78 (+/-13)%; p = 0.59. The probability of confirmed disease progression was 20 (+/-11)%. MRI data were available in 78 patients before transplant showing disease activity (gadolinium enhancing, new or enlarging lesions) in 33 %. Posttransplant MRI showed activity at any time in 5/61 (8 %) evaluable cases. Autologous HSCT suggest positive early results in the management of progressive MS and is feasible. These multicentre data suggest an association with significant mortality risks especially in some patient groups and are being utilised in the planning of future trials to reduce transplant related mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,811,446
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#269
of 4,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,811
of 241,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#2
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.