Title |
The use of vancomycin powder reduces surgical reoperation in posterior instrumented and noninstrumented spinal surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neurochirurgica, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00701-014-2022-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brian W. Hill, Osa Emohare, Bowei Song, Rick Davis, Matthew M. Kang |
Abstract |
Surgical site infections can complicate posterior spine surgery. Multiple hospital admissions may be required to adequately treat a surgical site infection, which is associated with increased costs and lower patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic intra-wound vancomycin powder in reducing the incidence of repeat surgery for infections after posterior instrumented and noninstrumented spine surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 23% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 54% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,405,018
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#464
of 1,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,281
of 221,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.