↓ Skip to main content

Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and the Potential Protective Role of Estrogen

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and the Potential Protective Role of Estrogen
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200232020-00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Becky Kendall, Roger Eston

Abstract

Exercise-induced muscle damage is a well documented phenomenon that often follows unaccustomed and sustained metabolically demanding activities. This is a well researched, but poorly understood area, including the actual mechanisms involved in the muscle damage and repair cycle. An integrated model of muscle damage has been proposed by Armstrong and is generally accepted. A more recent aspect of exercise-induced muscle damage to be investigated is the potential of estrogen to have a protective effect against skeletal muscle damage. Estrogen has been demonstrated to have a potent antioxidant capacity that plays a protective role in cardiac muscle, but whether this antioxidant capacity has the ability to protect skeletal muscle is not fully understood. In both human and rat studies, females have been shown to have lower creatine kinase (CK) activity following both eccentric and sustained exercise compared with males. As CK is often used as an indirect marker of muscle damage, it has been suggested that female muscle may sustain less damage. However, these findings may be more indicative of the membrane stabilising effect of estrogen as some studies have shown no histological differences in male and female muscle following a damaging protocol. More recently, investigations into the potential effect of estrogen on muscle damage have explored the possible role that estrogen may play in the inflammatory response following muscle damage. In light of these studies, it may be suggested that if estrogen inhibits the vital inflammatory response process associated with the muscle damage and repair cycle, it has a negative role in restoring normal muscle function after muscle damage has occurred. This review is presented in two sections: firstly, the processes involved in the muscle damage and repair cycle are reviewed; and secondly, the possible effects that estrogen has upon these processes and muscle damage in general is discussed. The muscle damage and repair cycle is presented within a model, with particular emphasis on areas that are important to understanding the potential effect that estrogen has upon these processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 203 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 49 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 77 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 57 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,441
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,188
of 201,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#763
of 988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.