Title |
Refined saddle-point preconditioners for discretized Stokes problems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Numerische Mathematik, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00211-017-0908-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John W. Pearson, Jennifer Pestana, David J. Silvester |
Abstract |
This paper is concerned with the implementation of efficient solution algorithms for elliptic problems with constraints. We establish theory which shows that including a simple scaling within well-established block diagonal preconditioners for Stokes problems can result in significantly faster convergence when applying the preconditioned MINRES method. The codes used in the numerical studies are available online. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 6 | 75% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,472,268
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Numerische Mathematik
#192
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,483
of 316,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Numerische Mathematik
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them