↓ Skip to main content

わが国におけるアシダカグモの地理的分布

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Entomology and Zoology, January 1975
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
わが国におけるアシダカグモの地理的分布
Published in
Medical Entomology and Zoology, January 1975
DOI 10.7601/mez.26.255
Authors

大利 昌久

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,416,735
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Medical Entomology and Zoology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,068
of 20,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Entomology and Zoology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them