↓ Skip to main content

Acculturation Differences in Communicating Information About Child Mental Health Between Latino Parents and Primary Care Providers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Acculturation Differences in Communicating Information About Child Mental Health Between Latino Parents and Primary Care Providers
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10903-014-0010-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Lê Cook, Jonathan D. Brown, Stephen Loder, Larry Wissow

Abstract

Significant Latino-white disparities in youth mental health care access and quality exist yet little is known about Latino parents' communication with providers about youth mental health and the role of acculturation in influencing this communication. We estimated regression models to assess the association between time in the US and the number of psychosocial issues discussed with the medical assistant (MA) and doctor, adjusting for child and parent mental health and sociodemographics. Other proxies of acculturation were also investigated including measures of Spanish and English language proficiency and nativity. Parent's length of time in the US was positively associated with their communication of: their child's psychosocial problems with their child's MA, stress in their own life with their child's MA, and their child's school problems with their child's doctor. These differences were especially apparent for parents living in the US for >10 years. Parent-child language discordance, parent and child nativity were also significantly associated with communication of psychosocial problems. Greater provider and MA awareness of variation in resistance to communicating psychosocial issues could improve communication, and improve the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of youth mental illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 16 15%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 30 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#14,723,294
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#819
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,604
of 229,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.