↓ Skip to main content

Long-term Impacts of Contrasting Management of Large Ungulates in the Arctic Tundra-Forest Ecotone: Ecosystem Structure and Climate Feedback

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Long-term Impacts of Contrasting Management of Large Ungulates in the Arctic Tundra-Forest Ecotone: Ecosystem Structure and Climate Feedback
Published in
Ecosystems, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10021-014-9767-3
Authors

Martin Biuw, Jane U. Jepsen, Juval Cohen, Saija H. Ahonen, Mysore Tejesvi, Sami Aikio, Piippa R. Wäli, Ole Petter L. Vindstad, Annamari Markkola, Pekka Niemelä, Rolf A. Ims

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Researcher 13 15%
Unspecified 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 21%
Unspecified 10 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#1,120
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,348
of 245,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.