↓ Skip to main content

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Practice Patterns by NFL and NCAA Football Team Physicians

Overview of attention for article published in Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Practice Patterns by NFL and NCAA Football Team Physicians
Published in
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandon J. Erickson, Joshua D. Harris, Yale A. Fillingham, Rachel M. Frank, Charles A. Bush-Joseph, Bernard R. Bach, Brian J. Cole, Nikhil N. Verma

Abstract

This study aimed to determine practice patterns for National Football League (NFL) and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football team orthopaedic surgeons regarding management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in elite, young, and middle-aged recreational athletes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 182 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Other 24 13%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Sports and Recreations 20 11%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 49 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#1,176,034
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#102
of 4,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,322
of 238,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#2
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.