| Title |
Bulk metallic glasses for biomedical applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOM, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11837-009-0128-1 |
| Authors |
Jan Schroers, Golden Kumar, Thomas M. Hodges, Stephen Chan, Themis R. Kyriakides |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 31% |
| Researcher | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 45 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 83 | 35% |
| Engineering | 51 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 72 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2012.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#1,358
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,466
of 94,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.