↓ Skip to main content

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Changing Trends

Overview of attention for article published in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Changing Trends
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12178-014-9207-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolaas C. Budhiparama, Matthew P. Abdel, Nadia N. Ifran, Sébastien Parratte

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been identified as an immediate threat to patients undergoing major orthopedic procedures such as total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the known dangers of VTE, arthroplasty surgeons are sensitive to the need for VTE thromboprophylaxis. However, the modalities of thromboprophylaxis used to minimize the risks to patients have been variable. Clinical practice guidelines have been published by several professional organizations, while some hospitals have established their own protocols. The 2 most popular guidelines are those published by the Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), both from North America. Prior to 2012, these recommendations varied depending on underlying definitions, methodology, and goals of the 2 groups. For the first time, both groups have similar recommendations that focus on minimizing symptomatic VTE and bleeding complications. The key to determining the appropriate chemoprophylaxis for patients is to balance efficacy of a prophylactic agent, while being safe in regards to bleeding complications. However, a multimodal approach that focuses on early postoperative mobilization and the use of mechanical prophylaxis, in addition to chemoprophylaxis, is essential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Student > Postgraduate 12 17%
Other 9 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,165,098
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#140
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,695
of 226,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.