↓ Skip to main content

Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist?

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist?
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, May 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00423-004-0476-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. G. Smeenk, T. C. K. Tran, J. Erdmann, C. H. J. van Eijck, J. Jeekel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Unspecified 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#269
of 1,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,993
of 58,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.