You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
DERIVED STIMULUS RELATIONS, SEMANTIC PRIMING, AND EVENT‐RELATED POTENTIALS: TESTING A BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF SEMANTIC NETWORKS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1901/jeab.2005.78-04 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dermot Barnes‐Holmes, Carmel Staunton, Robert Whelan, Yvonne Barnes‐Holmes, Sean Commins, Derek Walsh, Ian Stewart, Paul M. Smeets, Simon Dymond |
| Abstract |
Derived equivalence relations, it has been argued, provide a behavioral model of semantic or symbolic meaning in natural language, and thus equivalence relations should possess properties that are typically associated with semantic relations. The present study sought to test this basic postulate using semantic priming. Across three experiments, participants were trained and tested in two 4-member equivalence relations using word-like nonsense words. Participants also were exposed to a single- or two-word lexical decision task, and both direct (Experiment 1) and mediated (Experiments 2 and 3) priming effects for reaction times and event-related potentials were observed within but not across equivalence relations. The findings support the argument that derived equivalence relations provides a useful preliminary model of semantic relations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 34% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 53 | 60% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
#684
of 1,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,052
of 205,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
#373
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.