↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Omega-3 and -6 Supplementation on Language in Preterm Toddlers Exhibiting Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Omega-3 and -6 Supplementation on Language in Preterm Toddlers Exhibiting Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3249-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly W. Sheppard, Kelly M. Boone, Barbara Gracious, Mark A. Klebanoff, Lynette K. Rogers, Joseph Rausch, Christopher Bartlett, Daniel L. Coury, Sarah A. Keim

Abstract

Delayed language development may be an early indicator of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Early intervention is critical for children with ASD, and the present study presents pilot data on a clinical trial of omega-3 and -6 fatty acid supplementation and language development, a secondary trial outcome, in children at risk for ASD. We randomized 31 children to receive an omega-3 and -6 supplement or a placebo for 3 months, and measured their language abilities at baseline and after supplementation. Gesture use, but not word production, increased for children in the treatment group more than children in the placebo group. These results suggest possible effectiveness of omega-3 and -6 supplementation for language development in children at risk for ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Master 19 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 10 7%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 51 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 16%
Psychology 23 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 60 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,490,520
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#566
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,760
of 327,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#17
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.