You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping stone: using GIS spatial modelling to predict lithic source zones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.035 |
| Authors |
Chris Clarkson, Angelo Bellas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 28% |
| Researcher | 31 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 45 | 34% |
| Arts and Humanities | 41 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2022.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#2,367
of 2,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,582
of 240,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#55
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.